Maths-
General
Easy
Question
Statement-I The equation has exactly one solution in [0, 2].
Statement-II For equations of type to have real solutions in should hold true.
- Statement-I is true, Statement-II is true ; Statement-II is correct explanation for Statement-I.
- Statement-I is true, Statement-II is true ; Statement-II is NOT a correct explanation for Statement-I.
- Statement-I is true, Statement-II is false.
- Statement-I is false, Statement-II is true.
Hint:
In this question, given two statement. It is like assertion and reason. Statement1 is assertion and statement 2 is reason , Find the statement 1 is correct or not and the statement 2 correct or not if correct then is its correct explanation.
The correct answer is: Statement-I is true, Statement-II is true ; Statement-II is NOT a correct explanation for Statement-I.
Here , we have to find the which statement is correct and if its correct explanation or not.
Firstly ,
Statement-I: The equation √(3 ) cosx- sinx=2 has exactly one solution in [ 0 , 2 π ]
We have,
√(3 ) cosx- sinx=2
⇒√(3 )/2 cosx-1/2 sinx=1
⇒cos〖π/6〗 cosx-sin〖π/6〗 sinx=1 [ since we know that sinπ/3 = √(3 )/2 and cos〖π/3〗 = 1/2 ]
⇒cos〖(π/6+ x )=1〗 [ since ,cos a cosb -sin a sinb = cos ( a + b ) ]
⇒cos〖(x+ π/6)=1〗
⇒ x + π/6 = 2nπ
⇒ x = 2nπ - π/6
For n = 0 , we have x = - π/6 , and ∉ ( 0,2π)
For n = 1 , we have x = 11 π /6 , and ∈ ( 0, 2π)
For n = 2, we have x = 23 π /6 and ∉ ( 0, 2π)
it have only one solution in [ 0 , 2π]
x = 11 π /6
Therefore, the Statement-I is true.
Now,
Statement-II : For equations of type acos θ + bsin θ = c to have real solution in [ 0 , 2π], |c| ≤ √(a2+ b2 ) should hold true.
We have ,
acos θ + bsin θ = c
⇒a /c cos θ + b/c sin θ = 1
Let a/c = sinα and b/c = cosα
We have,
⇒ sinα cos θ + cosα sin θ = 1
⇒ sin(θ + α ) = 1 [ since, sin a cosb + cosa sinb = sin( a+ b)]
Therefore, (θ + α ) is definitely lies in [ 0 , 2π]. Hence statement – II is true. But it is not correct explanation of statement – I .
The correct answer is , Statement-I is true, Statement-II is true ;Statement-II is NOT a correct explanation for Statement-I
In this question, we have to find the statements are the correct or not and statement 2 is correct explanation or not , is same like assertion and reason. Here, Start solving first Statement and try to prove it . Then solve the Statement-II . Remember cos a cosb -sin a sinb = cos ( a + b ) and sin a cosb + cosa sinb = sin( a+ b) .
Related Questions to study
maths-
Assertion : If A is a skew symmetric matrix of order 3 then its determinant should be zero.
Reason : If A is square matrix then det A = det = det (–)
Assertion : If A is a skew symmetric matrix of order 3 then its determinant should be zero.
Reason : If A is square matrix then det A = det = det (–)
maths-General
maths-
Assertion : There are only finitely many 2 × 2 matrices which commute with the matrix
Reason : If A is non-singular then it commutes with I, adj A and A–1
Assertion : There are only finitely many 2 × 2 matrices which commute with the matrix
Reason : If A is non-singular then it commutes with I, adj A and A–1
maths-General
maths-
Consider the system of equationsx – 2y + 3z = –1–x + y – 2z = kx – 3y + 4z = 1
Assertion : The system of equations has no solution for k 3.and
Reason : The determinant 0, for k 3.
Consider the system of equationsx – 2y + 3z = –1–x + y – 2z = kx – 3y + 4z = 1
Assertion : The system of equations has no solution for k 3.and
Reason : The determinant 0, for k 3.
maths-General
maths-
Assertion : If a, b, c are distinct and x, y, z are not all zero given that ax + by + cz = 0, bx + cy + az = 0, cx + ay + bz = 0 then a + b + c 0
Reason : a2 + b2 + c2 > ab + bc + ca if a, b, c are distinct
Assertion : If a, b, c are distinct and x, y, z are not all zero given that ax + by + cz = 0, bx + cy + az = 0, cx + ay + bz = 0 then a + b + c 0
Reason : a2 + b2 + c2 > ab + bc + ca if a, b, c are distinct
maths-General
maths-
Assertion : If A is a skew symmetric of order 3 then its determinant should be zero.
Reason : If A is square matrix then det A = det = det (–)
Assertion : If A is a skew symmetric of order 3 then its determinant should be zero.
Reason : If A is square matrix then det A = det = det (–)
maths-General
maths-
Assertion : There are only finitely many 2 ×2 matrices which commute with the matrix
Reason : If A is non-singular then it commutes with I, Adj A and A–1.
Assertion : There are only finitely many 2 ×2 matrices which commute with the matrix
Reason : If A is non-singular then it commutes with I, Adj A and A–1.
maths-General
maths-
Let a matrix A = & P = Q = PAPT where PT is transpose of matrix P. Find PT Q2005 P is
Let a matrix A = & P = Q = PAPT where PT is transpose of matrix P. Find PT Q2005 P is
maths-General
maths-
Let A = & I = and A–1 = [A2 + cA + dI], find ordered pair (c, d) ?]
Let A = & I = and A–1 = [A2 + cA + dI], find ordered pair (c, d) ?]
maths-General
maths-
= A & | A3 | = 125, then is -
= A & | A3 | = 125, then is -
maths-General
maths-
If A = , B = and A2 = B, then
If A = , B = and A2 = B, then
maths-General
Maths-
Let A be a square matrix all of whose entries are integers. Then which one of the following is true ?
Let A be a square matrix all of whose entries are integers. Then which one of the following is true ?
Maths-General
maths-
Let A = If |A2| = 25, then || equals
Let A = If |A2| = 25, then || equals
maths-General
Maths-
Let A = and B = , a, b N. Then
Let A = and B = , a, b N. Then
Maths-General
Maths-
If A and B are square matrices of size n × n such that A2 – B2 = (A – B) (A + B), then which of the following will be always true –
If A and B are square matrices of size n × n such that A2 – B2 = (A – B) (A + B), then which of the following will be always true –
Maths-General
Maths-
If A = and I = , then which one of the following holds for all n 1, by the principle of mathematical induction -
If A = and I = , then which one of the following holds for all n 1, by the principle of mathematical induction -
Maths-General